AI in fiction · scored for reality

The future arrived
with consequences.

A realism index for the artificial minds in films, television, anime and games. We separate plausible systems from beautiful nonsense.

Featured case / 001

Plausible

8.5/10

SILO

Closed systems · information control · machine governance

Scope

Film · TV · Anime · Games

Standard

Evidence over vibes

Position

Neither hype nor dismissal

01 / THE INDEX

The complete case files.

Compare every published case by medium, evidence category, and final score.

33 case files

  1. 01
    Game
    Technical9.5
    Human9.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal8.5
    9.0Near-future credible
  2. 02
    Film
    Technical7.5
    Human8.5
    Institutional9.5
    Causal9.0
    8.6Plausible with conditions
  3. 03
    TV
    Technical7.5
    Human9.5
    Institutional7.5
    Causal9.5
    8.5Plausible with conditions
  4. 04
    TV
    Technical8.0
    Human9.0
    Institutional9.5
    Causal7.5
    8.5Plausible with conditions
  5. 05
    Film
    Technical7.0
    Human9.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal8.5
    8.4Plausible with conditions
  6. 06
    Film
    Technical7.5
    Human9.0
    Institutional8.5
    Causal8.5
    8.4Plausible with conditions
  7. 07
    TV
    Technical7.0
    Human9.0
    Institutional9.5
    Causal8.0
    8.4Plausible with conditions
  8. 08
    Film
    Technical6.5
    Human9.5
    Institutional8.5
    Causal8.5
    8.3Plausible with conditions
  9. 09
    Film
    Technical8.0
    Human8.0
    Institutional8.5
    Causal7.5
    8.0Plausible with conditions
  10. 10
    Game
    Technical5.5
    Human9.0
    Institutional8.0
    Causal9.5
    8.0Plausible with conditions
  11. 11
    Anime
    Technical6.0
    Human8.5
    Institutional9.0
    Causal8.0
    7.9Plausible with conditions
  12. 12
    TV
    Technical5.5
    Human8.5
    Institutional8.5
    Causal8.0
    7.6Plausible with conditions
  13. 13
    Anime
    Technical5.0
    Human9.5
    Institutional9.0
    Causal7.0
    7.6Plausible with conditions
  14. 14
    Anime
    Technical4.0
    Human8.5
    Institutional9.0
    Causal8.5
    7.5Plausible with conditions
  15. 15
    Film
    Technical7.0
    Human9.5
    Institutional5.5
    Causal7.5
    7.4Plausible with conditions
  16. 16
    Anime
    Technical4.5
    Human9.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal7.0
    7.4Plausible with conditions
  17. 17
    Film
    Technical6.0
    Human8.5
    Institutional6.0
    Causal9.0
    7.4Plausible with conditions
  18. 18
    Film
    Technical5.0
    Human8.5
    Institutional7.5
    Causal8.0
    7.3Plausible with conditions
  19. 19
    Film
    Technical5.5
    Human8.5
    Institutional8.0
    Causal7.0
    7.3Plausible with conditions
  20. 20
    Game
    Technical3.5
    Human8.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal8.5
    7.3Plausible with conditions
  21. 21
    Game
    Technical5.0
    Human6.0
    Institutional8.5
    Causal8.5
    7.0Plausible with conditions
  22. 22
    Film
    Technical5.5
    Human7.5
    Institutional7.5
    Causal7.5
    7.0Plausible with conditions
  23. 23
    Game
    Technical4.5
    Human8.0
    Institutional8.5
    Causal6.5
    6.9Speculative but coherent
  24. 24
    Film
    Technical5.5
    Human7.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal6.0
    6.9Speculative but coherent
  25. 25
    Film
    Technical6.0
    Human8.5
    Institutional4.5
    Causal8.0
    6.8Speculative but coherent
  26. 26
    Game
    Technical4.0
    Human7.0
    Institutional9.0
    Causal6.5
    6.6Speculative but coherent
  27. 27
    Film
    Technical4.5
    Human7.5
    Institutional8.5
    Causal6.0
    6.6Speculative but coherent
  28. 28
    Film
    Technical5.0
    Human8.0
    Institutional8.0
    Causal5.5
    6.6Speculative but coherent
  29. 29
    Film
    Technical6.5
    Human6.5
    Institutional7.0
    Causal6.0
    6.5Speculative but coherent
  30. 30
    Anime
    Technical5.0
    Human7.0
    Institutional8.0
    Causal6.0
    6.5Speculative but coherent
  31. 31
    Game
    Technical3.5
    Human5.0
    Institutional6.0
    Causal10.0
    6.1Speculative but coherent
  32. 32
    Film
    Technical3.5
    Human8.5
    Institutional6.0
    Causal5.5
    5.9Speculative but coherent
  33. 33
    TV
    Technical3.5
    Human8.0
    Institutional4.0
    Causal6.5
    5.5Speculative but coherent

02 / THE METHOD

A score you can argue with.

Each title receives four scores from 0–10. Every category carries equal weight, and the final Realism Index is their average, rounded to one decimal place.

The number summarizes the argument. Each case file explains the evidence, its assumptions, and where the fiction takes a necessary shortcut.

01 · 25%

Technical feasibility

Could the system work as shown? We examine data, compute, architecture, interfaces, embodiment and known research limits.

02 · 25%

Human behavior

Would people adopt, trust, misuse or resist it this way? Convenience, fear, status and dependence all count.

03 · 25%

Institutional response

Do companies, governments and communities respond according to their incentives, capabilities and power?

04 · 25%

Causal consistency

Once the story sets its rules, does it follow the consequences—or ignore them whenever the plot needs an escape?

Reading the Realism Index

9.0–10Near-future credibleThe premise and its consequences could survive contact with reality.
7.0–8.9Plausible with conditionsA convincing core idea with a few visible shortcuts.
5.0–6.9Speculative but coherentThe technology stretches belief, while the consequences hold together.
3.0–4.9Dramatic shortcutThe system behaves mainly to serve the plot.
0–2.9Pure fantasyAI functions as magic, monster, or metaphor.

A score may change when new evidence emerges or a story develops. Each revision is dated and explained.